Livestock Weekly
January 7, 2010
Attorney Calls For Centralized Groundwater Management In Texas
By Colleen Schreiber
AUSTIN — “I am convinced that the current system of groundwater management in Texas is an obsolete model and has no place in Texas in the 21st century.” That was one of the opening remarks offered by Steve Kosub, water resource counsel for the San Antonio Water System, at a recent Texas Water Law conference sponsored by the University of Texas School of Law.
“Each biennium that passes without the Texas legislature recognizing this issue and confronting this issue places us further behind as a state in our efforts to develop the essential water resources necessary for the future,” Kosub continued. “Eventually we will find that the gap is too large to overcome.
“Longterm water supply plans by water developers and municipalities and other water agencies are being made, changed, or abandoned completely in a total vacuum of uncertainty that will ultimately result in enormous wasted public funds and future water shortages.”
In addition to offering some broad thoughts on whether or not local control and management of groundwater is working or can work, Kosub also discussed what he referred to as “checks and balances,” or regulatory restraint. Within that topic he voiced some concerns that he has with Chapter 36 of the Texas Water Code dealing with but not limited to the authority of groundwater districts and their relationship with the courts. Finally, he offered some thoughts and concerns with respect to the groundwater management planning/desired future condition process scheduled to be completed in 2010.
First, on the matter of local control, Kosub told listeners that two years ago his response with respect to whether or not local control of groundwater could work was a guarded “no.” Today, however, it’s a resounding “no.”
“After two additional years in the trenches on this issue, I’m much less judicious in my response,” he told fellow attorneys.
Part of the reason for his less judicious response is that over the last couple of years, two-thirds of the state’s groundwater resources — its usable aquifers — have been “Balkanized into a patchwork quilt” of close to 100 groundwater districts.
The problem as he sees it is that each district’s boundaries are drawn along political county lines without any consideration given to the physical boundaries of the resource itself, i.e. the aquifer or aquifers. Moreover, each district has its own locally elected directors who adopt a management plan, and within that plan are rules by which they make permitting decisions. These rules, Kosub insisted, can “literally change overnight.”
Kosub said he was not being critical of the groundwater districts and the people involved per se, but rather the system itself.
“By statutory design, directors of local groundwater districts are elected locally and must respond to local constituents, and protection of local groundwater resources is far and away the singular issue for the people who elect these folks to office.
“Directors have not been charged by the Texas legislature with providing water to urban areas; they have not been charged by the Texas legislature with managing the state’s groundwater resources for the benefit of the state, and they’re not elected to do so. Nonetheless, the groundwater that they are elected to manage absolutely must be produced and transported to distant urban areas if the state’s health, safety and economic needs are to be met,” Kosub told listeners. “This I would submit to you is the fundamental flaw in our current groundwater management system.”
It was a daunting picture he painted when he reminded listeners that the state’s population is projected to double over the next 50 years, and most of that doubling, some 25 million new people, will occur within 30 miles of Interstate 35 and Interstate 10. To meet that need, Kosub said the state will need an estimated seven million acre-feet of new water supplies. To put that in context, he noted that just one of San Antonio’s water supply projects, which is projected to cost in the range of $200 to $300 million and will take 10 years just to get underway, will only yield an estimated 10,000 acre-feet of new water.
“We need seven million acre-feet,” he reiterated.
The current surface water supplies, Kosub reminded, are essentially appropriated, and there is continual new demand placed on those resources to resolve such matters as environmental flow issues. Furthermore, even if there were an excess of available surface water in one area of the state, Kosub said, interbasin transfers, for all practical purposes, have been stopped.
He also opined that the chances of developing new reservoirs are nil. He pointed to the recently scrapped reservoir project in northeast Texas.
“Dallas started thinking about that reservoir in the early part of the 20th century, almost 100 years ago,” Kosub told listeners.
Coming back to the issue of local control, Kosub recognized again that local groundwater districts have neither a mandate nor an incentive from the state to make the water available to other users in the state. He shared a quote from a representative of a groundwater district published in a recent newspaper article.
“We’re not going to make real radical changes or restrict anybody’s freedoms. All we’re trying to do is protect inflows into the aquifer and keep people from taking water and selling it to outside interests.”
Kosub didn’t just point to the flaws he sees in the current groundwater management problem, but followed up with some ideas for a solution. He called for more centralized management of the state’s groundwater resources. As a model for such a system, he pointed to three state agencies — the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, which manages surface water; the Public Utility Commission, which manages the state’s electricity; and the Texas Railroad Commission, which for a century now has managed oil and gas resources. All of these agencies, he noted, have done a relatively adequate job of management of commodities valuable to the entire state.
“Can you imagine how the economy of this state would have evolved if oil and gas were managed by 100 different county-based, locally elected entities that decided what oil and gas would be pumped and where it would be sent?”
Though the Texas Water Development Board doesn’t in the least appear to embrace the idea of taking on more of a regulatory role for groundwater management, there are some, including Kosub, who believe the agency should do that very thing.
“They have the necessary resources in place for management of groundwater; they have the science; they have the people that understand the turf,” Kosub told listeners.
Others believe that groundwater and surface water should be managed conjunctively, and supporters reason who better to do that than TCEQ.
Kosub noted that there were editorials in three of the state’s major urban newspapers calling for change in the current system of groundwater management. He pointed to the recently announced 81st legislative interim charges, specifically the House Committee on Natural Resources, as a hopeful sign that change may be forthcoming. The Speaker’s interim charge to the committee is to evaluate groundwater regulations and permitting processes throughout the state, including the role of state agencies in groundwater management, and development of DFCs and adoption of groundwater management plans in relation to regional and state water plans.
He identified a couple of other factors that are likely to prompt changes to the current system. One is what he called “the trumping” of an effective regional water planning process developed in Senate Bill 1 by local groundwater district decisions. Another is financially related.
“In the last few years we’ve seen for the first time some financial markets beginning to experience the implications of local permitting for the security of public debt issued to finance expensive water supply projects,” Kosub told listeners.
Parts of the state also experienced drouth this past year. All of these forces collectively, he insisted, will encourage and facilitate a change.
“With determination and visionary leadership, I think we can move into a different management system, moving from an uncontrolled, unregulated water supply to a fully permitted system transitioning from local management to state management of our groundwater supplies in a decade.”
Meanwhile, some changes need to be made to provide for temporary effective local management of groundwater resources in the interim, Kosub said. Those changes have to do with what he referred to as “checks and balances.”
With the evolution of administrative agencies, as government became more and more complex and issues became more and more technical and more and more difficult to address, the need for checks and balances has grown substantially, Kosub said. To that end, on the federal level there is the Administrative Procedure Act adopted in 1946. Texas adopted a similar law in 1975. The problem is that governing groundwater conservation districts are “neither beast nor fowl within the traditional notions of the state administrative practice.” Instead, districts are governed by Chapter 36 of the Texas Water Code, Kosub reminded, where the administrative processes for governing groundwater districts are found. The problem, he opined, is that Chapter 36 is a “hodgepodge” of administrative processes which have been evolving for 50 years, one legislative session at a time, a handshake here, a nod there.
“What we have is a piece of statutory work that is rapidly becoming incomprehensible. What it does not do is establish a comprehensive process by which permitting and regulatory decisions are made at the local level,” he insisted.
In recent years, Kosub continued, the legislature has inserted some rudimentary process requirements in Chapter 36, but it comes nowhere close to standards imposed on state agencies.
“If a permit applicant is unhappy with a decision made by their local groundwater district, the applicant may appeal the decision to the local district court. However, the local district court has but one function, Kosub said, and that is to look at the record developed before the agency and decide if there’s more than a scintilla of evidence to support the decision.”
He compared that system of checks and balances to that of the Administrative Proceedings Act and reiterated that that there is a “big disconnect” between the two.
Kosub identified some other challenges that he sees with Chapter 36, the biggest being the issue of attorneys’ fees. He pointed out that in two different sections of Chapter 36 the legislature mandated that if an unhappy applicant challenges a decision of the groundwater district and loses, the court has no choice but to award attorneys’ fees to the district. The rub, Kosub said, is that there is no precedent for that in Texas law.
“There are many circumstances in which courts have the discretion at the end of the hearing to award attorneys’ fees to the prevailing party, but nowhere else will you find a provision that says if you have the temerity to sue and lose, you’re going to be responsible for the district’s attorney fees.”
It’s a big deal, he said, because attorney fees are a big deal. Case in point is the recent groundwater cases that have worked their way up through the courts.
“We’re talking about districts’ attorney fees in the range of a half-million dollars.
“If you’re a landowner, farmer, rancher, and you feel you’ve been aggrieved by a decision of the groundwater district and you want to challenge that decision in court, what might your decision be if you know you have a better than 50 percent chance of losing, and if you lose you’re going to have to write a check for half a million to the groundwater district? I would submit to you its going to have a substantial effect on the willingness of landowners, the ability of landowners, to challenge the work of groundwater districts. That’s a bad thing.”
It’s something that could be amended through the legislature, Kosub noted, but as of yet that has not been accomplished.
In his paper, Kosub writes that other things in Chapter 36 that deal a “poor hand” to applicants include “statutory presumptions of validity, mandatory venue on the district’s home turf, mandatory and unfamiliar motion requirements, and extraordinarily short filing deadlines.”
Kosub turned next to the issue of desired future conditions. Essentially, the legislature charged groundwater districts to work together with other districts within their prescribed groundwater management area to determine what they wanted their aquifer or aquifers to look like in 50 years. The one DFC for the GMA is then forwarded to the Texas Water Development Board, which calculates how much groundwater is available to achieve those DFCs.
The problem has been that each of the groundwater districts is coming up with its own DFC, and there seems to be little consensus on what the actual DFC should be for the entire GMA.
“More importantly, we’re seeing that districts are backing into those numbers by determining what restrictions they want on pumping for particular projects,” Kosub told listeners.
The problem, he reiterated, is a lack of checks and balances. The only appeal for this decision-making process is through the TWDB. TWDB merely issues recommendations to the districts, and the districts can accept or ignore the recommendations.
“The process begins and ends with groundwater districts,” Kosub stressed.
Again, he said, it’s a process that can easily be improved by making the last word lie with TWDB on DFCs. However, the Edwards Aquifer Authority, as do some other groundwater districts, actually prefers to strengthen the hand of groundwater districts rather than enhance checks and balances.
“The relief sought by the EAA would further insulate groundwater districts from judicial review, and in some cases even legislative oversight,” he insisted.
To that end he quoted two excerpts from recent briefs submitted by the EAA. In the Day case and in the Del Rio case, the EAA asked the court to hold that landowners do not have a constitutionally protected interest in groundwater.
“In holding that landowners have vested ownership rights in groundwater, the San Antonio Court of Appeals decision jeopardizes the ability of the legislature to fulfill its mandatory duty under the Conservation Amendment of the Texas Constitution to provide for the regulation and management of vital and life-sustaining groundwater resources,” the EAA wrote.
A second quote from the EAA’s amicus brief in the Del Rio case is as follows:
“If groundwater regulation in Texas generally, and in the Edwards Region in particular, is to progress and succeed, the Court should clarify that landowners have no vested property rights to groundwater underlying their land.”
Calling the EAA “the gold standard for groundwater districts,” Kosub acknowledged that the EAA has crafted and implemented a fair, effective and successful regulatory program on a regional basis. That said, the EAA’s enabling legislation drafted by the legislature, he insisted, was also meant to recognize and respect a wide array of interests. He pointed to Section 1.07, Ownership of Underground Water, which says:
“The ownership and rights of the owner of the land and the owner’s lessees and assigns, including holders of recorded liens or other security interest in the land, in underground water and the contract rights of any person who purchases water for the provision of potable water to the public or for the resale of potable water to the public for any use are recognized. However, action taken pursuant to this act may not be construed as depriving or divesting the owner or the owner’s lessees or assigns including holders of recorded liens or other security interests in the land, of the ownership rights or as impairing the contract rights of any person who purchases water for the provision of potable water to the public for the resale of potable water to the public for any use, subject to the rules adopted by the authority or district exercising the powers provided by Chapter 52, Water Code. The legislature intends that just compensation be paid if implementation of this article causes a taking of private property or the impairment of a contract in contravention of the Texas or Federal Constitution.”
A similar recognition of property rights in groundwater is also found in Chapter 36.002 of the Texas Water Code and in the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as well as the Texas Constitution, Article 1 Section 17, all of which refer to the taking of one’s property and the requirement of just compensation.
Kosub said the analysis for a takings case is relatively complex but “not as hard as we tend to make it.”
Essentially, if the regulation does not constitute a complete physical taking of the resource, then the courts look to the Penn Central analysis for a ruling. The problem, Kosub said, is one can’t get to that analysis if one never gets past the doorstep. That doorstep, he said, is whether or not there’s a property interest that needs to be protected and that can be taken.
He referred to the agreement that property ownership in groundwater should not be recognized as the “scorched earth defense.”
“It’s an effective strategy in the short term, but it’s going to have very significant long-term implications for the state of Texas in terms of groundwater management,” Kosub opined.
“If in fact the landowner has no interest in the groundwater until the groundwater district issues you a permit, then you’re going to cut the constitutional tether on regulatory constraint,” he added. “If you remove the constitutional restraints on regulation, in my opinion, that’s moving in the wrong direction. We need to encourage constitutional restraint if we’re going to have effective regulation of groundwater districts.”
This can be fixed, Kosub opined, through judicial response on the current pending groundwater cases, or by the legislature stating its clear intent with respect to the vesture of groundwater.
Other things can be done in the interim. One thing, he said, is to assure that groundwater districts have adequate funding to do the job they were charged with doing.
“The source of this funding should not be exclusively the property owners and pumpers who also bear the brunt of the district’s regulatory actions,” remarked Kosub. “Rather, these costs should be shared by the public which enjoys the district’s protection.”
He reiterated, however, that these are temporary remedies and should not be considered an adequate substitute for centralized state management of groundwater resources.
He concluded by reiterating the staggering growth statistic of 25 million new Texans over the next 50 years.
“If you leave here and remember nothing else from this presentation, leave with this thought on your mind. We have a system that is systemically broke. We have groundwater management placed in the hands of local groundwater districts with local officials elected to meet local needs who are nonetheless expected by the State of Texas to manage that resource for the benefit of the state.
“It’s a fundamental flaw, and all the nibbling in the world around the edges will not fix that flaw.
“Thus, our philosophy of groundwater management must be revised to ensure that we meet future demand as well as protect future supply. The task is monumental. We must begin now.”
The Latest News
LCRA was selling water from Burnet County well that's now dry
The Lower Colorado River Authority was selling water from the Spicewood Beach water system less than four weeks before the well serving the area ran dry, officials said Wednesday. Read full Statesman.com article.
Panel discussion with the Imagine Austin Citizens' Advisory Task Force, February 10
The University of Texas will host the next installment of its City Forum series, February 10, with a panel discussion on the City of Austin's long-awaited comprehensive plan, Imagine Austin. Learn More
TWDB to Decide “Desired” Future of Trinity Aquifer on March 1st
The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) was scheduled to review two challenges and decide on the reasonableness of the Desired Future Conditions for the Trinity Aquifer in the Texas Hill Country at their February 1st board meeting. At the request of WVWA, the Board President granted a continuance yesterday and moved the agenda item to the March 1st scheduled board meeting. TWDB is expected to rule on a protest to the Desired Future Condition (DFC) goal adopted by GMA 9, a goal that some argue is not sustainable. The proposed DFC allows for an average of 30 feet of additional groundwater decline over the next 50 years (an average of 19 feet across Hays County). Read More
Travis County passed new rules to protect water resources
After months of vetting by a diverse volunteer stakeholder committee made up of scientists, developer interests, landowners, residents and groundwater planning professionals Travis County Commissioners unanimously passed recommended new subdivision rules dealing with water use. “Already built or planned subdivisions and those with five or fewer lots that use surface water or have a rainwater collection system to back up groundwater would be exempt from the rules.” Read a brief from the Austin American Statesman that includes a link to the feature article from earlier this week here. Read Travis County staff summary to the Court here.
Spicewood Beach and neighbors getting water trucked in
A Central Texas community has run out of water amid a statewide drought, prompting the Lower Colorado River Authority to start trucking in water. Read more from Statesman.com.
Rethinking water: Growing population, limited supply mean costs destined to rise, experts say
Is water too cheap? Perhaps the most obvious indication that it is, said Michael Webber, a University of Texas professor who heads a research group focused on water and energy, is how freely we use it. A growing population requires more water, which the state says can't come from one source. Addressing the state's water needs requires a range of solutions, most of which are expensive. Read more from Statesman.com.
New Study shows billboards hurt nearby property values
A new study shows that billboards negatively affect the values of neighboring properties. It also found that cities with strict billboard controls are experiencing greater economic prosperity than those with controls that are less strict. Read full article in Scenic America's newsletter, Scenic Overlook.
Couple's fight with pipeline company pits Texans' love of oil vs. love of land
The Gipses are one of hundreds in the Crossroads with pipelines crisscrossing their property. For the Gipses and others, their worries aren't about fracking or possible pollutants. For them, the problems start with two legal words: eminent domain. Read full VictoriaAdvocate.com article.
Night Skies showing Venus and the Moon
The HCA photo contest opens on March 1st which is just one month away. Right now the night sky is displaying a wonderful show of the Moon and Venus. Check out these beautiful, inspirational photos. Many local efforts are underway to retrofit outdated lighting in order to protect the night skies. Keep up with this issue and talk with your neighbors about protecting starry skies in the Hill Country.
Lawyer was the bridge over troubled waters
Robert Gulley returned to San Antonio after 44 years to accept a job with the expectation he would fail. His task was to get a 26-member committee representing industry, environmental groups, farmers and cities to agree on how to share the Edwards Aquifer. Read more from SA Express-News.
Burnet/Llano County Water Issues Meeting, January 26
The Central Texas Water Coalition (CTWC), together with Burnet County, will hold an informational session on the region’s most pressing water issues. Area residents and business owners will be able to engage in a Q&A session with a panel of representatives from LCRA, TCEQ, TWDB, Corp of Engineers, and CTWC. Details
LCRA water plan revisions are ready for public comment
“Releasing a new proposed model for managing its water, the Lower Colorado River Authority published its draft water plan Tuesday, detailing stricter guidelines for releasing water to rice farmers and nearly doubling water reserves for cities and power plants.” The plan is posted at LCRA.org. Comments are due February 9th and can be submitted electronically. The LCRA Board will consider the plan at its February 22 meeting. Read more from the Austin American Statesman.
Medina Lake withers on
Medina Lake not been this low in more than two decades, and the lake is expected to continue to lose a few inches every day as the 15-month drought continues. Every drop means less water available for farmers and the city of San Antonio. Read full Houston Chronicle article.
LCRA: Spicewood Beach wells have two to three weeks of water remaining
The well supplying water for about 1,100 residents near Spicewood Beach in Burnet County is at risk of running dry in two to three weeks because of prolonged drought conditions…"We are hopeful that conservation efforts will extend the life of the well, but even so, it is likely the well will become unusable in the next few weeks." Learn More
Drought Emergency Planning Workshops
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) will be hosting drought emergency planning workshops throughout the state in January and February 2012. The workshops will provide local government officials, board members, and their water system operators information and tools to prevent and mitigate water outages. Learn More
Wildfire Preparedness Seminar, January 30 in Kerrville
The Upper Guadalupe River Authority has partnered with Texas AgriLife Extension Service, Kerr County, and Headwaters GCD to bring a wildfire preparedness seminar to our area. Topics will include the current status of the drought, wildfire prevention and preparedness, local burning regulations, and a legislative forecast. Details
Wind Turbines + Transmission: A Performance Art Show
Andy Wilkinson designed the project to capture the changing landscape of wind industry through the voices of those involved and impacted by areas of development. He has interviewed farmers, landowners, wind developers, municipal leaders, and environmentalists. The event takes place at TTU in Junction, Thursday evening 1/26. Learn More
Texas' Water Rights System Gets Tested in Drought
Earlier this month, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality issued a notice to a handful of East Texas groups in the Sabine River Basin: Their rights to river water will be suspended because a hunting and fishing club needs more water. The club's right to water predates the others' rights — literally. Read full Texas Tribune article.
Texas Fracking Disclosures to Include Water Totals
Starting Feb. 1, drilling operators in Texas will have to report many of the chemicals they use in hydraulic fracturing. Environmentalists and landowners are looking forward to learning what acids, hydroxides and other materials have gone into a given well.
But a less-publicized part of the regulation is what some water experts are most interested in: the mandatory disclosure of the amount of water needed to “frack” each well. Experts call this an invaluable tool as they evaluate how fracking affects water supplies in the drought-prone state. Read more from Texas Tribune.
Let’s teach our kids about Major Rivers, Watersheds and Aquifers
The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) has a great program to educate 4th and 5th graders about water resources. Talk this up with your local Hill Country elementary school teachers, let them know that now is the time to order materials. Let’s work together to help the next generation understand watershed systems, the relationship between groundwater and surface water and the importance of conservation. Learn more, register for webinar and place an order here.
Develop water strategy to slake Texans' thirst
The state's population is expected to nearly double by 2060, from 25.4 million people to 46.3 million, according to the state water plan. New management strategies and supply projects are needed to meet the state's residential, business and agricultural water needs. Failure to act could result in devastating business losses, lost jobs and reduced incomes, the state plan says; public health and economic development will suffer. More from Statesman.com.
1,800-home development in western Travis County to go forward
Home construction at the stalled, 1,400-acre Sweetwater development in western Travis County is likely to start by March. On Tuesday, Travis County commissioners unanimously approved aspects of the project that allow Sweetwater's developer to sell lots and continue building roads for the new residential community at Texas 71 near Bee Creek Road. Read full Statesman.com article.
Could water, power woes threaten state's economy?
Dwindling supplies of water and electricity are imperiling the state's economic future, a Texas Senate committee was told Tuesday. Read more from Statesman.com.
Water rate hike provokes county officials
Kerr County commissioners and the county judge had harsh words for the proposed Aqua Texas water rate increase but have basically no way to fend off the new charges. According to the TCEQ, customers have a 150-day comment or protest period after they receive notice of the proposed rate increase. Read full Kerrville Daily Times article.
KLRN Broadcast: Eagle Ford: Opportunity and Challenge
“Predictions on the billions of dollars in oil and natural gas that will come out of the Eagle Ford shale project are mind boggling... The environmental impact of fracking hasn't been effectively measured yet, and many claim the process pollutes well water, or even might cause earthquakes. Read about the program hosted by Robert Rivard. Tune in to KLRN San Antonio, Thursday, January 12th from 8 – 9 pm.
The Future of Texas Drought, January 12
The Central Texas Water Coalition's January 12 meeting will feature, "The Future of Texas Drought," a presentation by Texas State Climatologist, John Nielson-Gammon. Travis County Commissioner Karen Huber will be on hand to talk about her recently released Lake Travis Economic Impact Study, and Burnet County Judge Donna Klaeger will discuss the proposal for the studies of Burnet and Llano Counties. Learn More
After exceptionally hot and dry 2011, more drought forecast for new year
After enduring the record-setting heat and dry conditions of 2011, drought-weary Texans are being greeted with forecasts of more of the same for the new year. Read more from TexasClimateNews.org.
The 2012 State Water Plan was sent to the Governor on January 5, 2012
“The primary message of the 2012 State Water Plan is a simple one: In serious drought conditions, Texas does not and will not have enough water to meet the needs of its people, its businesses, and its agricultural enterprises.” Learn more from TWDB. Read what Tom Mason, former LCRA General Manager has to say about the plan here.
Keeping rural roots alive without leaving the city
A great story featuring thoughts of Wendell Berry and Wes Jackson, two sustainable agriculture pioneers… “We came here as poor people on rich land, but now we are rich people on poor land," Jackson said. "As we made 'progress,' we didn't realize what we were undoing in the process. Our society is built upon the withdrawal on the "capital stock of the earth." Read story from Statesman.com.
Private Lands, Public Benefits: Innovations to Sustain the Private Lands that Provide Food, Fiber and Water Policy
In early December, the Texas Agricultural Land Trust and Texas Department of Agriculture hosted Private Lands, Public Benefits in Austin, Texas. The full day conference showcased examples of unique, market based approaches to land and natural resource conservation. Topics included; land fragmentation and loss of rural lands, purchase of development rights or “PDR” programs, the value of natural ecosystems and conservation easements. Learn more about the conference and access speaker presentations. Learn more about Land Conservation and Conservation Easements.
Environmental impact of CREZ
December 23rd was the final day to submit public comments for the LCRA draft Environmental Assessment (dEA), draft Habitat Conservation Plan (dHCP) and related Incidental Take Permit (ITP). The Study Area includes six counties (Tom Green, Schleicher, Kimble, Kerr, Gillespie and Kendall) The impacts of these 18-story high lattice towers used to build 178 miles of industrial scale transmission lines (known as CREZ projects) will change the Hill Country region forever. Hearings will be set soon, you can find out more and review documents at USFW. Comments filed by SOSHE and CVA are posted on our CREZ Issue page.
The Texas Water Crisis
Texas water authorities at every level are on alert. Last summer’s extremely hot, dry weather was a wake-up call. Now more than a dozen Texas towns are in danger of running out of water. Texas is in a water crisis. To make it official, the Texas Water Development Board December report says the state reservoirs are extremely low even after some autumn rain. More from CleanHouston.org
Dangers of fracking still becoming clear
The word "fracking" may sound funny, but it describes a drilling practice that has created a serious boom in natural gas production in Texas and elsewhere, and with the boom has come serious worries about fracking's effects on the environment. More from Statesman.com.
Final piece of aquifer plan approved
In a brief, anticlimactic ending to a painstaking, four-year-long process, the Edwards Aquifer Authority board voted Wednesday to approve the funding for a habitat conservation plan that should keep the region's main aquifer under local control. The plan calls for habitat restoration at the springs, storing water in an underground reservoir built by SAWS, and for all municipal and industrial pumpers to pay farmers not to pump during droughts. Read more from SA Express-News.
Travis County park purchase to add access to Pedernales River
Earlier this month, Travis County commissioners closed on a 770-acre ranch owned by Eugene and Jean Reimers in southwestern Travis County near the Hays County line that will connect Milton Reimers Ranch Park and Hamilton Pool Nature Preserve. More from Statesman.com
EAA Board Approves Funding Agreement for Habitat Conservation Plan
The Edwards Aquifer Authority (EAA) Board of Directors approved a funding and management agreement on Tuesday, December 28, that details how the EAA will pay for implementing a habitat conservation plan (HCP) aimed at protecting threatened and endangered species whose only known habitats are the aquifer-fed Comal and San Marcos springs. More from AACOG.com
Commissioners endorse preserving night skies, PEC offers support
Kimble County and the PEC agree to work together to protect nights skies. “As Judge Murr stated, the night sky is part of the region’s scenic beauty that brings significant economic and financial benefits to the community.” Read more from the Junction Eagle. More from HCA on Night Skies here.
Water planners urged to base needs on centuries, not decades, of drought data
Over the past 500 years, Central Texas has seen droughts far worse than the 1950s drought of record, according to a report commissioned by the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority and published Wednesday in the December issue of the Texas Water Journal. Researchers warn that makers of water policy should broaden their planning to factor in the possibility of droughts far worse than the spell that set the bar more than a half-century ago. Read more from Statesman.com.
Texas Tree Ring Study Warns of Long Droughts
A new study of tree rings adds to evidence that Texas has experienced at least one 10-year drought every 100 years, as well as several "mega-droughts" lasting 15 to 30 years over the centuries. Read full Texas Tribune article.
Growth of large private water companies brings higher water rates, little recourse for consumers
Across the state, a growing number of suburban Texans are getting their water from large, private corporations owned by investors seeking to profit off the sale of an essential resource. State figures show private companies are seeking more price increases every year, and many are substantial. Read full Statesman.com article.
Water a hot topic in Hill Country despite recent rains
"Statistics provided by the Texas Water Development Board show that groundwater withdrawal from the Hill Country's Edwards and Trinity aquifers increased dramatically between 1975 and 2010. In 1975, less than 10,000 acre-feet were withdrawn annually; that shot up to 41,000 acre-feet in 2010. Mix in recent drought years, and a picture of a thirsty Hill Country natural world comes into sharper focus." Read more from SA Express-News.
Hays County Master Parks Plan Draft Available for Public Review
The draft of the new Hays County Parks, Open Space and Natural Areas Master Plan has been completed and is available for public review through 5 p.m. January 11, 2012. It has not yet been endorsed or adopted by the Hays County Commissioners Court. Read More
Rainwater harvesting system should make this year's wish list
Dear Santa, I've been reasonably good and would like pearl earrings, an electric lap blanket, a digital reading device and, oh yes, a rain water harvesting system. With water being a top concern, you may want to add this to your Christmas wish list. Capturing rain water is a great way to improve your water resources. Read more from MyWestTexas.com.
LCRA downsizes staff, reapproves selling water system for $140 million
The Lower Colorado River Authority has eliminated about 200 jobs in a cost-saving measure and reapproved selling off one of its largest water and wastewater systems for $140 million. Read more from Statesman.com.
New rules for fracking approved
The Texas Railroad Commission approved a rule Tuesday requiring oil and natural gas drillers to disclose most of the chemicals they use in hydraulic fracturing. Read full SA Express-News article.
Vote sinks aquifer funding
The Edwards Aquifer Authority board failed Tuesday to approve funding for a plan to assure continued pumping from the region's main aquifer and protect springflows in San Marcos and New Braunfels. The 8-7 vote against the funding agreement means it will be very difficult if not impossible to meet the deadline established by the state Legislature for a habitat conservation plan. Read full SA Express-News article.
Wildlife Tax Valuation Workshop
The Cibolo Nature Center and Texas Parks and Wildlife are presenting a three part Wildlife Tax Valuation Workshop in January. This indepth seminar is especially for owners with more than 20 acres and emphasizes wildlife management strategies that improve native habitat and increase species diversity. Details
Texas State Parks need $4.6 million to help keep parks open
Record drought and heat, devastating wildfires, and a drop in visitation have led to a critical situation for state parks. See how you can help.
Texas’ multibillion-dollar cost to build wind energy lines raises doubts
Texas electricity regulators proposed the $5 billion project a few years ago to bring West Texas wind power to North Texas and Houston. But the markets and the political mood have changed. Carbon dioxide is no longer the most popular foe. Now it’s electricity shortages and blackouts. Read full DallasNews.com article.
Hill Country Landowners take action to protect springs and property rights
So, what happens when local residents and landowners don’t agree with the groundwater management plan handed down by a regional governing body that affects the future of a precious, local groundwater resource?
The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) has a process for such situations, and it’s now playing out with precision in the Wimberley Valley of Hays County. Read More
A sustainable Hill Country eats locally
December 3rd – December 10th is the 5th Annual Edible Austin Eat Drink Local Week! Hosted by Edible Austin, this is Austin’s premier local food event, celebrating local seasonal food and foodmakers in Central Texas and raising money for Urban Roots and Sustainable Food Center. Learn more about Hill Country sustainable agriculture here.
Regional Rail from San Antonio to Georgetown
Project Connect is a collaboration of transportation agencies exploring “high-capacity transit” for our region. Check out this news segment from KUT and KXAN. Open house public meetings will be held in the Austin area December 6, 8 and 9. Learn More
Submit Your Nominations for the Texas Rain Catcher Award
Time is running out to submit your entry for the 4th Annual Texas Rain Catcher Award. The Texas Water Development Board's (TWDB) Texas Rain Catcher Award is a "rainwater harvesting" competition and recognition program designed to promote rainwater technology, educate the public, and recognize excellence in the application of rainwater harvesting systems in Texas. The deadline for nominations is Dec. 31. More information on eligibility, benefits, judging, entries and past winners is available on the TWDB's Innovative Water Technologies website.
Read more Hill Country newsEmphasized
Upcoming Events
February
February 1-3 in San Antonio - Texas Trails & Active Transportation Conference - Details
February 7 in Austin - Texas Enterprise Speaker Series Presents: What's the Future of Energy? | Details
February 7 in Kerrville - Drought Emergency Planning Workshop - Details
February 9 in New Braunfels - Drought Emergency Planning Workshop - Details
February 10 in Austin - City Forum, Imagine Austin: Looking Back, Looking Forward - Details
February 15-17 in San Antonio - Texas Transportation Forum - Details
February 22-24 in Austin - Texas Land Trust Council's 2012 Statewide Land Conservation Council - Details
February 23-24 in San Antonio - 13th Annual Changing Face of Water Rights Course - Details
March
March 7-9 in Dallas - Texas Water Conservation Association (TWCA) 2012 Annual Convention - Details
March 30-April 1 in San Marcos - Texas Rainwater Catchment Association's 2012 Conference - Details
April
April 25-28 - 13th Annual Nature Quest - Learn from Hill Country nature experts through field trips, workshops, nature by kayak and programs along the Clear Frio, Nueces & Sabinal Rivers - Details
April 27-29 in Fredericksburg - Wings Over the Hills Nature Festival - Details
May
May 5 in Bandera - 12th Annual Medina River Cleanup - Details
August
August 28-30 in Austin - Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts: Texas Groundwater Summit - Details
See more upcoming events
2012 Texas Hill Country Calendar
This spectacular combination of art, literature and nature is intended to inspire new and creative ways of protecting this fragile region.
Click here to purchase
Imagine a place where vibrant communities draw strength from their natural assets to sustain their quality of life. A place where citizens care about protecting the special qualities of a region – their region. A place where people and partners band together to envision a better economic future, tackle shared challenges and care for the natural, scenic, and recreational resources that define the place they call home.
~This is a Conservation Landscape
Helpful Mapping Resources - Beautiful and informative maps of the region to print and share.
HCA Dynamic Mapping Tool - This dynamic online mapping tool includes water resource information, regional geography, natural resource information, jurisdictional boundaries and more using GIS layers in an easy to use Google Earth platform.
